Post by Bykerhttps://www.bbc.com/news/business-56506529
The worlds largest coal mining firm is to "aggressively" pursue solar
energy and continue to close smaller mines.
How many centuries will it be before anyone notices the difference?
https://www.google.com/search?q=india+smog
Coal is not "forever" because alternatives ARE starting
to be competitive. Not quite there yet, but looking better.
So, time for oil and coal companies, while they still have
the money, to transform into ENERGY companies that
are invested in all parts of the equation. Hell, maybe
Exxon should open an e-auto plant so they have both
energy production AND the means of consumption
putting money in the bank.
There are still tons of uses for petrochemicals besides
pouring them in your tank, but coal .... its future will end
sooner than later unless some radically new use is
found for the stuff. Even then, expect the human miners
to be replaced by machines within a decade or so.
So much for the Unions. Remotely operated, semi-
autonomous and finally fully autonomous - the machines
will be "better" and a lot cheaper. Meanwhile, China
really loves coal, so there will be a big offshore market
for awhile yet.
Saw an article the other day about a whole different
kind of photoelectric (phys.org ?) that uses one
"2 dimensional" atomic layer over another. The
stuff mentioned was black phosphorus over some
boron compound - the crystal structure is ALMOST
the same, and apparently the slight mis-alignment
creates the photoelectric effect. The inventors
say they'll have higher efficiency than silicon and
be as cheap as those perovskite cells everybody
has been working on for a decade.